First off it is not a tax cut it is a contribution. FICA or otherwise known as social security which needs all the money it can get because it is going broke. Second it would help mainly only those who at the end of the year do not pay any taxes anyway. Third the republican plan is to do it for another year not 2 months, plus create hundreds maybe thousands of jobs with the pipeline deal.
 So get your facts straight before you fire off a tirade of inaccuracies.

Your ignorance shows through like the sun in August. Everything I stated was a fact not a tax but a contribution into their Social security, and the Republican plan does it for a year plus creates jobs.
 Why do it for just 2 months? Why not a year? I will tell you why, because then the Obama can continue to claim until election how he helped the little person.
 I have a good new job for Obama, send his butt to North Korea and let him rule there that country is more along his thinking.
 Also your redneck analogy really shows your Yankee ignorance. I am a business owner, have been for over 2 years, I do all aspects of the business from work to book keeping, and This middle class person is getting killed by small businesses going out of business because of King Obama and all the hoops and paper work I have to do now because he is in office. He is not helping the working slob he is only helping the leeches that suck on the govt tit for their survival. And what surprises me the most is from what I have gathered about you you also own/run a business and yet you still support this moron and his party.

what unions like it? that pipeline is a crappity smacking joke-enivironmental disaster, insignificant job creation. How about building a toxic sewage rocket that shoots sh!t up into outerspace creating 3 thousand jobs for a few months? the toxins would stay way out there for about 50 years until they are absorbed back into our atmosphere. That sounds pretty sound, doesnt it?  LMFAO!

I'd be open to a 100% payroll tax cut... and in exchange I'd waive any expectation of receiving any money from Social Security in the future.  Give me an opt out button.  

However many ways you slice it, if the U.S. government doesn't start figuring out a way to stop spending money, we increase the risk we are going to default on our debt.   The results would be catastrophic.  You certainly can't argue that the situation is improving.  
 
It starts with entitlements and ends with being the policeman of the world.  Both philosophies must radically change.  No politician has any balls to do this of course, and I wouldn't get all excited that a two term Obama would grow a pair either.
 
The answer is Ron Paul.   It is that simple folks.  Despite his extreme views and questionable foreign policy (as a whole), it is his unbending fiscal ironclad beliefs that the country needs now more than ever.  While you may have dismissed him as a crackpot wack-a-loon  ten years ago, you have to admit he makes a lot of sense today.  With no politician courageous enough to take a stand on major financial reform, why not Ron Paul?
 
Let's face it....after Bush Jr. and Obama, could it really get any worse?   I doubt Ron Paul's inadequate portfolio as a whole to be President is going to amount to a hill of beans compared to the crappity smacking debacle the last two have been.